Whether actual experience or perception, the 2015 meeting of the American Society of Environmental History seemed as large and busy as it has ever been. In addition to catching up with colleagues, meeting new ones, and seeing the new books on display, I came away from the conference with a pair of impressions.
The first involves format. This year’s schedule emphasized roundtable discussion, and in my experience (as both panelist and audience member), every roundtable successfully generated candid and creative discussions about where environmental history may go. I hope the society will continue to emphasize this format in the future.
The second involves approach. One theme of many sessions was the centrality of work to the ways humans, other organisms, and the environment have interacted throughout time. Ed Russell continued his fascinating approach to evolutionary history with a preview of his book on greyhounds. Building on the work he’s done since the Envirotech e-mail discussion “are organisms technology?” almost fifteen years ago, Ed argued the preindustrial notion of dog breeds had more to do with behavioral traits than physical appearance, and breed became define by the specific jobs the dogs were expected to perform. I look forward to reading Fast Dogs and Englishmen when it is published, and not simply because I’ve lived with retired racing greyhounds for the past decade or so.
Speaking of Envirotech, the group’s Saturday-morning breakfast was larger than I’ve ever seen, with about fifty attendees. Though I was able to talk to a small fraction of the attendees, the research questions and approaches from members continue to be among the most interesting work around.
As for my work, Connie Chiang, Rob Gioielli, Agnes Kneitz, Chris Wells, and I participated in a roundtable on the Future History of Environmental Justice Thursday with a splendid conversation involving temporal scopes, analytical frameworks, identity issues, and politics. Thanks to them and the audience, we had an engaging discussion for the entire ninety minutes. In keeping with my upcoming book Clean and White (and a theme I’ve focused on since 2004’s “Dirty Work” article), my contribution involved arguing that looking at the relationship between work, human health, and the environment was a particularly fertile way to forge new scholarship on the histories of environmental inequalities.
A later panel on social history and environmental history featured a similar argument, and Chad Montrie’s admonishment that environmental historians need to look at labor and labor’s experiences as we craft narratives of the history of environmental movements is especially relevant. Attention not only to work in this vein already being presented at the conference, but also reaching out to listen to historians and historical organizations such as LAWCHA whose concerns may relate (even while not defining them as environmental history) would be potential areas where ASEH can learn, engage with new voices, and collaborate in the future.
Most of the work discussing work completed, the conference concluded with an awards ceremony capped by my dissertation advisor Joel Tarr receiving the organization’s distinguished service award to a standing ovation. I cannot comprehend how my thinking, career, and life would have turned out if not for Joel, and the room was full of people who could say the same. Having the society acknowledge his influence so enthusiastically was a fitting end to the weekend.
ASEH meets in Seattle next spring under the leadership of new president Kathy Brosnan and president-elect Graeme Wynn. The call for proposals is here.